A Survey of Interdependent Information Security Games

August 2014·
Aron Laszka
Aron Laszka
,
Mark Felegyhazi
,
Levente Buttyán
Abstract
Risks faced by information system operators and users are not only determined by their own security posture, but are also heavily affected by the security-related decisions of others. This interdependence between information system operators and users is a fundamental property that shapes the efficiency of security defense solutions. Game theory is the most appropriate method to model the strategic interactions between these participants. In this survey, we summarize game-theoretic interdependence models, characterize the emerging security inefficiencies, and present mechanisms to improve the security decisions of the participants. We focus our attention on games with interdependent defenders and do not discuss two-player attacker-defender games. Our goal is to distill the main insights from the state-of-the-art and to identify the areas that need more attention from the research community.
Type
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys, 47(2), 23:1–23:38
publications

Impact Factor: 23.8
Note: see also CrySyS Lab Technical Report No. CRYSYS-TR-2012-11-15: A Survey of Interdependent Security Games

Authors

Aron Laszka
Associate Professor

Aron Laszka is an Associate Professor in the College of Information Sciences and Technology at the Pennsylvania State University. Previously, he was an Assistant Professor at the University of Houston, a Research Assistant Professor at Vanderbilt University, and a Postdoctoral Scholar at the University of California, Berkeley.

His research interests revolve around artificial intelligence and cyber-physical systems, focusing on machine learning for decision making and optimization, with applications in smart and connected communities, critical infrastructure, and cybersecurity.

His research is funded by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the Department of Transportation, and other agencies.